Mythbusters

Ten things
people get wrong
about al-Andalus.

Polite but firm corrections.

9 min read

Al-Andalus was a paradise of convivencia where Muslims, Christians, and Jews lived in perfect harmony.

Exaggerated

The romantic interpretation of al-Andalus as a multi-confessional paradise — popularised in English by María Rosa Menocal's 2002 book The Ornament of the World — is a substantial overstatement of the historical record. The Caliphate was a Muslim state in which Christians and Jews lived as protected (dhimmi) minorities with substantial legal disabilities: they paid the jizya head tax, were excluded from senior state offices, were prohibited from building new religious buildings or repairing existing ones, and were subject to various discriminatory provisions. Periods of substantial inter-confessional violence occurred (the Cordoba martyrdoms of 850-859, in which approximately fifty Mozarabic Christians were executed for public anti-Islamic speech; the 1066 Granada massacre of perhaps four thousand Jews; the various Almohad-period suppressions of Christian and Jewish religious life). The substantive reality was, at the same time, that the system did allow for substantial cultural exchange, intellectual collaboration across religious lines (Maimonides studied Aristotle through Arabic commentaries by Averroes who had himself studied Aristotle through Arabic translations made by Christian and Jewish scholars), and considerable economic and social interaction. The "convivencia" framing is partially true (there was substantial collaboration) and partially misleading (it was not a paradise). A more accurate framing is "co-existence under conditions of legal hierarchy."

Al-Andalus was a brutal Muslim occupation that systematically oppressed the Christian population.

Partly true at specific moments. False as a general description.

The opposing romantic interpretation — popularised in some recent revisionist literature (notably Darío Fernández-Morera's 2016 The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise) — that al-Andalus was an unmitigated brutal occupation regime is equally a substantial overstatement. The Caliphate's substantial Christian and Jewish populations did continue to operate substantially intact religious and cultural institutions over centuries. The Mozarabic Church continued to function with its own liturgy, its own bishops, and its own monasteries through the entire caliphal period (the principal centres at Toledo, Sevilla, and Mérida operated continuously from the conquest through the eleventh century). The Jewish community of al-Andalus produced one of the high cultural periods of medieval Jewish history. Neither population was, in any reasonable sense, "systematically oppressed" in the way that, for example, the substantial Andalusian Muslim and Jewish populations of post-1492 Spain were systematically oppressed under the Inquisition. The Caliphate's regime was substantially more tolerant than the post-1492 Spanish regime that replaced it.

The Caliphate of Córdoba had a library of one million books.

Exaggerated

The library of Al-Hakam II at Madinat al-Zahra is variously reported by medieval Arabic sources at 400,000 manuscripts (the most widely cited figure), 500,000, and (in some later sources) up to 600,000. The "one million" figure that occasionally appears in modern popular accounts has no medieval source support. Even at the 400,000 figure, the library was substantially the largest in the medieval Mediterranean basin and an enormous achievement. The contemporary Christian European monastic libraries — the largest, at Cluny, perhaps holding 600 manuscripts — were of a different order of magnitude. The 400,000 figure is plausibly accurate; the higher figures are increasingly speculative.

The Reconquista was a single continuous Christian campaign.

False

The "Reconquista" as a single continuous campaign is a Spanish national-historical construction of the modern period, principally developed in the nineteenth century. The substantive historical record is that the Christian advance was conducted by different Iberian kingdoms (Castile, Leon, Aragón, Navarre, Portugal, the Catalan counties) at different times for different reasons, with substantial inter-kingdom rivalry and periodic Christian-Muslim alliances against other Christian kingdoms. Christian kings hired Muslim mercenaries; Muslim kings hired Christian mercenaries (the famous Castilian condottiere Rodrigo Díaz de Vivar, El Cid, served both Christian and Muslim employers in his career). The Reconquista as a self-conscious Christian crusading campaign emerged in the late twelfth and thirteenth centuries; the earlier period was substantially more complicated. The framing of the whole 711-1492 period as a single continuous Christian-Muslim war is anachronistic.

The Spanish Inquisition was founded to persecute Muslims.

False

The Spanish Inquisition was founded in 1478 by Ferdinand and Isabella primarily to investigate the religious orthodoxy of the Converso (formerly Jewish, now Christian) community. The Inquisition's first decades were principally focused on suspected crypto-Jewish practice among the Conversos. The Morisco (formerly Muslim, now Christian) population was a secondary target after 1502; substantial Inquisition operations against the Moriscos began in the 1530s. The institution operated for over three hundred years (until 1834) and at various periods focused on Protestants, Lutherans, Erasmians, Illuminists, Quietists, and other religious heterodoxies, as well as on Conversos and Moriscos. The framing that the Inquisition was specifically anti-Muslim is too narrow; it was a comprehensive institution of religious surveillance.

The Moors were Africans.

Many were of North African Berber origin; the population was substantially mixed.

"Moor" (from the Latin Maurus, "person from Mauretania") was the medieval and early-modern Christian European term for Muslims of the western Mediterranean, particularly those in Iberia. The population so designated was substantially diverse: ethnic Arabs descended from the original conquest forces (perhaps fifteen to twenty percent of the al-Andalus Muslim population at peak); ethnic Berbers from North Africa (perhaps another fifteen to twenty percent); ethnic Iberians converted from Visigothic-Roman Christianity (the muwallads, the largest single group at perhaps half the population); a small but substantial population of Slavic and East European slaves (the saqaliba) brought as palace personnel; and the children of mixed marriages. The "Moor" term covers this composite population. The contemporary popular image of the medieval Moors as Africans (in the modern racial sense) is a substantial simplification.

Andalusi Muslims preserved the Greek philosophical inheritance that Europe had lost.

True for specific texts and authors. Misleading as a general framing.

Substantial portions of the Greek philosophical, scientific, and medical inheritance were preserved in Arabic translations made during the Abbasid translation movement of the eighth to tenth centuries (substantially at Baghdad, with some additional work in al-Andalus). These translations subsequently entered medieval Christian Europe through the Toledo School of Translators and similar networks. For some major works (Aristotle's Politics, parts of Galen's medical corpus, substantial portions of the Greek mathematical and astronomical tradition), the Arabic translations were indeed the principal medieval channel of transmission.

However: substantial portions of the Greek inheritance were also preserved continuously in the Byzantine Empire (where Greek was the working language until 1453) and were transmitted to medieval Europe through the various Byzantine-Western intellectual contacts (the Byzantine-Sicilian contacts of the eleventh and twelfth centuries; the post-Crusader Byzantine cultural exchange; the substantial Byzantine emigration to Italy after the fall of Constantinople in 1453). The framing that "Europe had lost Greek philosophy" before the Arabic translations is inaccurate; what is accurate is that the Latin Christian West had limited access to much of the Greek inheritance through the early medieval period, and that Arabic translations were a substantial channel for the recovery of that inheritance.

The Arabic loanwords in Spanish prove the substantial cultural inheritance of al-Andalus.

True

Modern standard Spanish has approximately four thousand words of Arabic etymology — the substantial majority of which entered the language during the medieval period as a result of the eight-century Muslim presence and the subsequent Mudejar cultural continuity. The principal substantive areas of borrowing are agricultural and irrigation vocabulary (algodón "cotton," azúcar "sugar," albaricoque "apricot," berenjena "aubergine," naranja "orange," limón "lemon"), trade and commerce (almacén "warehouse," tarifa "tariff," aduana "customs"), military and administrative (alcalde "mayor," alguacil "sheriff," alférez "ensign"), domestic life (almohada "pillow," alfombra "carpet," alcoba "bedroom"), and substantial mathematical-scientific vocabulary (álgebra, algoritmo, alquimia "alchemy," alcohol, jaqueca "migraine"). The Arabic vocabulary in Spanish is the substantial linguistic inheritance of al-Andalus and provides the principal everyday evidence of the cultural inheritance.

The Caliphate of Córdoba fell to the Christian Reconquista.

False

The Caliphate of Córdoba ended in 1031 by internal civil war — the fitna — and was abolished by the Cordoban municipal council, not by Christian military conquest. Córdoba itself was not captured by the Christian armies until 1236, two centuries after the caliphate's end. The Christian Reconquista was a consequence of the post-caliphal fragmentation, not its cause: the small taifa successor states that emerged from the caliphate's dissolution were militarily vulnerable to the northern Christian kingdoms in a way that the unified caliphate had not been. The framing that "the Reconquista ended the Caliphate" reverses the actual chronology.

The Mezquita of Córdoba should be returned to Muslim use as a mosque.

A live political controversy with substantial arguments on each side.

The conversion of the Great Mosque of Córdoba to a Catholic cathedral after the 1236 Christian reconquest, and the subsequent insertion of a Renaissance cathedral choir into the centre of the building in 1523, has been the subject of substantial recurring controversy. Periodic requests by Spanish Muslim organisations for the partial restoration of Muslim use of the building (typically for occasional Friday prayer, not for permanent reconversion) have been repeatedly denied by the Diocese of Córdoba and by the Spanish Catholic hierarchy. The building's contemporary status as a working Catholic cathedral and a tourist site is established and is unlikely to change in the near term. The arguments on each side are substantive (the building was a mosque for 450 years; it has been a cathedral for nearly 800; the historical-architectural value of preserving the current mixed-character is real; the religious claims of Spanish Muslims for some level of access are real) and reasonable people disagree.


End of Mythbusters · End of Volume X